Structured Attorney Fees · Childs v. Commissioner

Won a big one?
Don't let one big year tax you at 55%.

Take a $1M, $5M or $20M contingency fee as a lump and it is all ordinary income in one year: 37% federal, 13.3% California (including the 1% mental health surcharge) and up to 3.8% in Medicare taxes, a top combined rate near 55%. Structured under IRC §451 and Childs v. Commissioner and paid over 5 to 30 years, each year’s share can land in lower brackets, often 22 to 32% federal. Spreading the fee across years can lower the total tax by keeping more of it out of the top brackets. Your result depends on your other income, your state and future tax law; the calculator below runs your numbers.

By , Tax & Exit Planning · Updated
Admitted to practice before the IRS.

Short answerStructured attorney fees let a contingency-fee lawyer take the fee as periodic payments instead of one lump sum. Under Childs v. Commissioner (1994) and Treas. Reg. §1.451-2, a fee deferred by written agreement before the case settles is taxed only as each payment arrives, which can keep each year out of the top bracket. The IRS disputes Childs in AM 2022-007, so design it with tax counsel.
Childs v. Commissioner (T.C. 1994) IRC §451 · Reg. §1.451-2 Insurers rated A or better (A.M. Best) NPN 20602398
Before you read further

What is the tax bill on your contingency fee going to be?

Send me the sale price and rough basis. Within one business day I'll email you the actual number and the Seller's Guide to §453. If it doesn't fit your deal, I'll tell you that plainly.

Hans Goldstein, EA
Admitted to practice before the IRS

No retainer · no obligation. Hans Goldstein, a licensed insurance agent (CA Insurance License #4273294), will contact you and may discuss insurance products, including annuities.

The smartest attorneys never take a career fee all at once.

Take a once-in-a-career fee in a single year and most of it lands in the top bracket. Childs lets you spread it, so each year sits in a lower bracket. Same fee, far less tax. Keep each income year small.

This is for you if:

  • A large contingency fee (or a big fee year), roughly $250K+
  • You don’t need the whole fee the day the case settles
  • You’d rather spread the income than get hit at the top in one year
  • You take fees on contingency (plaintiff / trial work)
The exact words that make this legal

For your CPA, the attorney-fee authority.

Deferring a contingency fee rests on a Tax Court holding and the constructive-receipt regulation. The exact basis is below. Print it or send it to your accountant.

The case: Childs v. Commissioner

The U.S. Tax Court held that an attorney who arranges to receive contingency fees in future installments before the fees are payable is not in constructive receipt, and is taxed only as each payment is actually received.
Childs v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 634 (1994), aff’d without published opinion, 89 F.3d 856 (11th Cir. 1996).

The rule underneath it: constructive receipt

“Income… is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.”
Treas. Reg. §1.451-2(a). You’re taxed when the fee is yours to take, not before.

The one rule you cannot break

The deferral agreement must be signed before the case settles (before the fee is earned and payable). The payment obligation is then assigned to a third party and funded by an annuity; you hold only an unsecured, non-assignable right to future payments. Set it up after settlement and it’s too late. Constructive receipt applies and the whole fee is taxed now.
Structure before you settle, not after.
Download the one-page authority sheet for your CPA →

Childs v. Commissioner · 103 T.C. 634 (1994), aff'd without published opinion, 89 F.3d 856 (11th Cir. 1996)

The Tax Court held that attorneys who agreed before settlement to take their contingency fees as periodic payments funded by annuities the obligors bought and owned were taxed on each payment only as it was received, not on the lump sum up front. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed without a published opinion. The IRS has never acquiesced, and its 2022 Chief Counsel memo (AM 2022-007) argues Childs does not cover arrangements built differently, so the design has to track the Childs facts. Plaintiffs’ firms have used this structure for 30 years.

Your case

Your fee & tax picture

Six inputs. Fee + your other income drive everything.

After your firm’s cut. This is YOUR share that hits W-2 / K-1 / 1099: the amount you’d otherwise pay full ordinary income tax on in Year 1.
W-2, partnership K-1 and investment income you earn even without this fee. Stacks under the fee in bracket calc.
IRMAA matters from 65+ (already on Medicare) or 63+ (2-yr lookback applies).
AUTO from term.~3.8% @ 5yr · 4.5% @ 10yr · 4.7% @ 15yr · 4.8% @ 20yr · 5.0% @ 30yr. Real quote at placement.
510152030 yrs
051015 yrs
Useful if you’re still at the peak of your career and want the income to backstop retirement. Carrier compounds the principal at the credit rate during the deferral.
Your answer
One big check today: the tax stack hits every bracket up to 37%. Spread over 15 years: the tax sits in lower brackets every single year.
Take cash today
…
After Year-1 ordinary tax stack of $… on full fee
Structure over 15 yrs
…
$…/mo after-tax · carrier compounds principal at 4.5%
Structured fee keeps you ahead by
…
This is bracket compression: the same total fee, taxed at lower brackets. The carrier also pays interest on the unpaid balance (extra upside, not counted here). Instead of stacking at 37% in one year, you’re in the 28% bracket every other year.
Effective rate · cash year-1
…
Federal + state (incl. MHST) + IRMAA
Effective rate · structured (blended)
…
Avg across 15 yrs · bracket compressed
For CPAs & tax counsel Year-by-year schedule · marginal rates · NIIT · IRMAA
YrPayment (gross)Top marginalTaxNet

Note:Marginal rate is the top bracket your fee payment touches each year, given $400,000 in other ordinary income stacked beneath it. Tax includes federal ordinary + state ordinary + NIIT on the fee portion (if applicable). IRMAA included if age 63+.

What this calc does NOT model:

Got a settlement pending? Set this up before the agreement is signed.

Constructive receipt rules mean the structured payment terms have to be fixed before the settlement is final and the fee becomes payable. If the case is days from settling, call Hans now.

213-414-2808 · Talk to Hans
For math nerds
  The math, full derivation

Pure ordinary-income bracket-stacking math. No GPR, no §453, no basis. Each year’s structured payment is treated as ordinary income, stacked on top of your other income for that year. The savings come from not getting bracket-stacked at 37% all in one year.

1. 2026 Federal ordinary income brackets (MFJ, Rev. Proc. 2025-32)

10%: $0 to $24,800
12%: $24,800 to $100,800
22%: $100,800 to $211,400
24%: $211,400 to $403,550
32%: $403,550 to $512,450
35%: $512,450 to $768,700
37%: over $768,700

# Single brackets are roughly half of MFJ caps · HOH falls between

2. Year-1 lump-sum stack (cash scenario)

TotalIncome = OtherOrdIncome + GrossFee
FedTaxcash = bracketTax(TotalIncome, FED_ORD) − bracketTax(OtherOrdIncome, FED_ORD)
# Marginal increment is the fee's tax, likely all in 35-37% if fee is large

3. Structured payment (no §453, no GPR, whole payment is ordinary)

PMT = Fee × r ÷ (1 − (1 + r)−n) # amortizing annuity, same as property SIS PMT formula

# Each year:
AnnualPayment = PMT (constant if no COLA)
TaxableThisYear = PMT (100% ordinary, no basis recovery, no LTCG split)

4. Per-year tax (structured scenario)

# Each year, the PMT is stacked on top of OtherOrdIncome (which may change over time):
Stackstart = OtherOrdIncomeyr
Stackend   = OtherOrdIncomeyr + PMT
FedTaxyr = Σi [bracketIncrementi] × ordRatei

StateTaxyr = stateBracketTax(Stackend) − stateBracketTax(Stackstart)
NIITyr = 0 # attorney fees are earned income, not investment income; NIIT does NOT apply to the fee itself
# NIIT may apply to OTHER investment income each year if MAGI exceeds threshold
IRMAAyr = irmaaSurcharge(MAGIyr) # if attorney is 63+ Medicare-eligible

5. Effective rate comparison

EffRatecash = TotalTaxcash ÷ Fee # likely 50-55% in CA/NY for large fees
EffRatestructured = (Σ TaxYr) ÷ (Σ PMTYr) # typically 35-42% blended

Savings = (EffRatecash − EffRatestructured) × Fee

6. Deferred-start growth (if applicable)

# If first payment delayed by d years, carrier compounds principal at r during deferral:
PMTdeferred = Fee × (1+r)d × r ÷ (1 − (1 + r)−n)
# Year-1 of payment becomes Year-(d+1) of plan; structure pays from d+1 to d+n

7. Childs v. Commissioner: the leading case

103 T.C. 634 (1994), aff'd without published opinion, 89 F.3d 856 (11th Cir. 1996)
Holding: Attorneys who agreed pre-settlement to take their fees as
periodic payments were NOT in constructive receipt of the lump sum,
and were taxable only on each payment as received.

Rules underneath it:
 • Treas. Reg. §1.451-2(a) (no constructive receipt under substantial limitations)
 • Treas. Reg. §1.83-3(e) (unfunded, unsecured promise to pay is not "property")
IRS view: AM 2022-007 (Dec. 2022, nonprecedential) says Childs does not
reach funded, invested, or loan-backed variations.
Statutory + case-law citations:IRC §451(a) cash-basis taxpayer · Reg. §1.451-2 constructive receipt · IRC §83 and Reg. §1.83-3(e) (an unfunded, unsecured promise to pay is not property) · IRC §409A (enacted 2004, after Childs; review with tax counsel) · Childs v. Comm'r, 103 T.C. 634 (1994), aff'd without published opinion, 89 F.3d 856 (11th Cir. 1996) · IRS Chief Counsel AM 2022-007 (Dec. 2022, nonprecedential). 2026 federal ordinary brackets per Rev. Proc. 2025-32.

Source code transparency:This calculator’s JavaScript is inline on this page. View source (Ctrl-U) to audit every formula, every constant. No external dependencies, no API calls.
More on the law and mechanics

Read deeper: the rest of the cluster.

The Childs case, in depthThe 1994 Tax Court ruling, the 1996 affirmation, and what it does not say. The mechanics, step by stepPre-settlement design, defense coordination, carrier placement, 1099 reporting. The IRS position vs the courtsThe IRS’s 2022 Chief Counsel memo (AM 2022-007) in plain English, and the §409A overlay every modern structure plans around. Who structures feesProfiles + thresholds: PI, class action, mass tort, ERISA fees, solos, plus when NOT to structure. Questions every plaintiff lawyer asksCarrier risk, retirement, §409A, malpractice, PC/PLLC structures, beneficiaries, year-1 1099. For your plaintiff: structured settlement calculator§104(a)(2) tax-free side-by-side. For PI / wrongful-death recoveries.
Hans Goldstein, NPN 20602398

📚 Get the free Seller's Guide to §453 + a fit-check

A plain-English guide for sellers on how a structured installment sale defers the tax when you sell a business, practice, or property. It covers the math, the alternatives, and how to tell if your deal fits.

Leave your details and the PDF downloads right away. Within one business day Hans will email a preliminary read on which structure fits your deal. No retainer. On a funded structure, the insurer pays a one-time commission of about 4% of the amount structured to the brokerage firm that places it (Hans’s share is about 2.4%; no trail). It is built into the annuity pricing, not a separate fee.

More details (optional)
Hans Goldstein, EA
Admitted to practice before the IRS

📞 Hans Goldstein · 213-414-2808 · CA Insurance License #4273294 · Independent §453 specialist · Goldstein & Co. LLC

Hans Goldstein, a licensed insurance agent (CA Insurance License #4273294), will contact you and may discuss insurance products, including annuities.

People also ask

How much money does an attorney take from a settlement?

It is set by the fee agreement. Contingency fees are commonly about a third of the recovery, often rising to around 40% if the case goes to trial, plus case costs. For the attorney, that fee is ordinary income in the year it is paid unless a deferral was agreed before settlement, which is why one large verdict can push a whole career fee into the top bracket.

Is a structured settlement a good idea for attorney fees?

It can be when the fee is large, you do not need all of it now, and the agreement is signed before the case settles. Spreading the fee lowers the bracket each year sits in. The trade-offs: the payments are an unsecured, non-assignable right, you cannot accelerate them later, and the IRS contests Childs in AM 2022-007, so the structure has to be drafted carefully.

Does the 3.8% NIIT apply to attorney fees?

Generally no. Fees earned in the active practice of law are earned income, not net investment income under §1411. They carry Medicare tax instead: 2.9% on self-employment earnings plus the 0.9% Additional Medicare Tax above $250,000 joint or $200,000 single, which also reaches 3.8% at the top. Deferring the fee spreads that Medicare tax across the payment years too.

Can attorneys defer contingency fees?

Yes, if the deferral is agreed in writing before the fee is earned and payable, which in practice means before the settlement agreement is final. The defendant or its insurer assigns the payment obligation to a third party that funds it with an annuity. Agree after settlement and constructive receipt applies, so the whole fee is taxed now.

Related

Sources: Treas. Reg. §1.451-2; IRS Chief Counsel AM 2022-007; IRS Topic 560, Additional Medicare Tax. Checked October 3, 2026.

Talk to Hans · 213-414-2808
Get my number Book 15 min Call