A $2M payday
Lump sum: $1.3M
Or
$1.6M+*

A big property or business sale, or a deferred attorney fee: instead of one giant check and a giant tax bill, a Fortune 500 insurer pays you like a pension. You keep more, it earns interest while you wait, and it’s legal because you never touched the lump sum.

IRS-recognized (IRC §453) A 1031 & DST alternative CPA-verifiable in 10 min
Start here, which one are you?
CA-licensed insurance producer · NPN 20602398

§453 has two engines, not one

Most explainers sell only the first. The second is the one that pays even if you’re in the top bracket every single year.

Engine 1

Bracket arbitrage

Spread the gain into years where you’re taxed at 15% instead of the top rate. Only works if you have low-income years. Always at the top? Skip this one.

Engine 2 · works at any bracket

Tax deferral

The insurer pays you out of the full, pre-tax proceeds. Your money earns a guaranteed, bond-like yield on every dollar the IRS hasn’t touched yet — for the whole term — and you’re taxed only as each payment arrives.

Engine #2 is the exact edge a 401(k) has over a taxable brokerage account: growth on pre-tax dollars compounds faster than growth on the after-tax remainder — because you never handed a third to the government up front. Already net $1M+ every year? →

The whole idea

The smart, asset-rich have a boring secret.

Pay less tax, so you keep more of your money. And how? Make each year’s income look smaller. Legally.

A big sale is one giant income year on paper, and that’s exactly what the IRS crushes. Take the same gain in planned pieces, and each year looks small on your return, so it’s taxed small. Same money. Far less tax.

That’s the entire idea of a Structured Installment Sale, when you’re selling property, real estate, or a business, or a Deferred Attorney Fee, when you’re an attorney collecting a contingency fee: take the big payday in small, scheduled pieces so you never have a giant income year. The IRS only taxes money once it’s actually yours to take, so until you take it, there is nothing to tax.

The honest nuance: the biggest bracket savings come when your other years are quiet — spreading the gain then keeps more of it in lower brackets. Already net seven figures every year? You skip that part, but you still win on deferral: your money earns a bond-like yield on the full pre-tax amount — before the IRS takes its cut — instead of on the after-tax remainder. See the math for high earners →
Word by word

What “Structured Installment Sale” actually means.

Three words, three requirements. A Structured Installment Sale is a completed sale of an appreciated asset where the proceeds are paid to you as a guaranteed, scheduled income stream, so you’re taxed on each payment as it arrives instead of all in one year (IRC §453). Here is exactly what each word has to mean for it to be legal:

The “how”

Structured

The payments have to be structured through an annuity from a life-insurance company, not just an IOU from the buyer.

On paper, the buyer’s obligation to pay you is legally assigned to the insurance company (a signed assignment). The buyer pays cash at closing and walks away clean; the A-rated insurer takes over and guarantees every payment.

The “what”

Installment

You’re paid in installments, a pension-like stream, funded by an annuity that grows tax-deferred.

The money keeps working for you before tax, and you owe tax only on each installment as it lands, never on the whole amount in a single year.

The “why it’s legal”

Sale

It is a real, completed sale, but the documents have to be signed correctly, before you close.

The key rule is no constructive receipt: you can never have the right to grab the lump sum. The installment-sale and assignment paperwork must be in place so the money is never “yours to take”, and that is exactly what keeps the deferral valid.

Bottom line: miss any one of the three, no insurance-company assignment, no real installment schedule, or you keep the right to the cash, and it’s just a fully taxable sale. Get all three right and it’s an IRS-recognized deferral under §453. That is the whole game, and it is exactly what we set up for you.
Who this is for

Is this you?

If that’s you, keep reading.

Probably not a fit if you need every dollar at closing, or your gain is under $500K. Top bracket every year regardless? Still a fit — you defer and earn yield on the pre-tax amount instead of the after-tax remainder.

In plain English

The move, in one picture.

Grab the whole lump sum and you get crushed by taxes now. Spread it over the years and you keep more. That’s the move on a big sale, or a large legal fee: take the money, and the tax, over time.

Sell now. Get paid over the years you pick. The IRS only taxes each check as it lands, not all in a single tax year. And the payments are locked in and guaranteed by an A-rated insurer.

Think of it as a mortgage in reverse. A mortgage lets your buyer pay you over 30 years so they don’t need all the cash today. This lets you get paid, and taxed, over time. Same tool, your side of the table.
Why you’re not taxed on it: you never take the cash. A third party, an assignment company, backed by a Fortune 500 insurer’s annuity, steps in and takes over paying you on the schedule you set. You never touch a lump sum, so the IRS doesn’t count it as received. It isn’t yours yet, it becomes yours payment by payment, and you’re taxed only on each piece as it lands.
What you actually get

Three things happen at once.

1. Lower brackets

Spread the gain over years and each year’s income stays low, so more of it is taxed at 15% and under the 3.8% line, not the top rate. That’s the third-to-a-quarter drop.

2. Your timing

You pay the tax as the cash actually arrives, on a schedule you design, not all in one hit. The IRS waits until the money is yours to take.

3. It pays you to wait

An A-rated, Fortune 500 carrier pays you on a schedule you design, from your pre-tax proceeds, at a steady bond-like yield. The money you haven’t been taxed on keeps working every year until it’s paid out.

On a $2M gain
All in one year
Spread over 10 yrs
Federal capital gains
20% · $400K
15% · $300K
Investment tax (NIIT)
$76K
~$0
California
13.3% · $266K
~9.3% · $186K
Total tax
~$742K (37%)
~$486K (24%)
You keep
$1.26M
$1.51M
Keep ~75%, or more. (Not ~65%.) About $250,000 less to the IRS on a $2M gain
, and the balance keeps earning a bond-like yield as it pays out like a pension, so you can keep even more.

Illustrative. Assumes a ~$200K/yr spread against modest other income; your numbers depend on income, gain, schedule, and rates. Not tax advice.

The payout rate is locked at funding and backed by the carrier’s claims-paying ability. Illustrative, your numbers depend on the schedule and rates at closing.

Why this passes the sniff test

It’s the tax code. Not a loophole.

The law

It’s written in the tax code — IRC §453, on the books since 1980. Not a loophole. Not a scheme. (Settlements run on §104; attorneys on Childs.)

The money

Your money comes from A-rated insurers, guaranteed. It does not depend on the buyer keeping a promise. A contract, not a handshake.

Verify it yourself

Don’t take our word for it. Hand this PDF to your CPA. They’ll confirm it in about ten minutes, the code sections are right there.

The exact words that make this legal

Not our words. The government’s.

Straight from the U.S. Code and the Tax Court, print it or send it to your CPA.

Download the one-page PDF for your CPA →

If you’re selling, IRC §453

“The term ‘installment sale’ means a disposition of property where at least 1 payment is to be received after the close of the taxable year in which the disposition occurs.”, §453(b)(1)

“…the term ‘installment method’ means a method under which the income recognized for any taxable year… is that proportion of the payments received in that year which the gross profit… bears to the total contract price.”, §453(c)
26 U.S. Code §453, Installment method (in the Code since 1980)

The principle underneath it all, constructive receipt

“Income although not actually reduced to a taxpayer’s possession is constructively received… [However] income is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.”
Treasury Regulation §1.451-2(a). Plain English: you’re taxed when the money is yours to take, not before. A properly structured installment sale means you have not yet received it, so there is nothing to tax yet.
For your CPA: why the assignment company doesn’t trigger constructive receipt

A CPA comfortable with a plain §453 installment sale may still ask: doesn’t assigning the buyer’s obligation to a third-party funding company give the seller constructive receipt? Here is the documented answer.

The governing rule, Treas. Reg. §1.451-2(a): “Income although not actually reduced to a taxpayer’s possession is constructively received… [However] income is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.”

Why the structured version clears it: under a non-qualified assignment, the buyer’s future-payment obligation is transferred to an assignment company that funds it (an annuity or U.S. Treasuries). The seller holds only an unsecured, non-accelerable, non-assignable right to fixed future payments, the seller cannot reach, pledge, accelerate, or sell that stream. Those are precisely the “substantial limitations or restrictions” the regulation requires, so there is no constructive receipt.

Economic benefit / cash equivalence: a right to future payments is taxed currently only if it is the equivalent of cash, freely assignable, unconditional, from a solvent obligor (Cowden v. Commissioner, 289 F.2d 20 (5th Cir. 1961)). A properly drafted structured installment obligation is not assignable by the seller and not a cash equivalent, so it is taxed only as payments are received.

One precision point: §130 “qualified assignments” apply only to §104 physical-injury settlements. A property or business sale uses a non-qualified assignment under §453; the assignment company recognizes the funding and offsets it with the annuity. This is the standard structure offered by A-rated carriers such as Independent Life and MetLife.

If you’re an attorney — Childs v. Commissioner

The U.S. Tax Court held that an attorney who arranges to receive contingency fees in future installments, before the fees are payable, is not in constructive receipt, and is taxed only as each payment is actually received.
Childs v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 634 (1994), aff’d 89 F.3d 856 (11th Cir. 1996)

If it’s an injury settlement, IRC §104

“…gross income does not include… the amount of any damages (other than punitive damages) received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness.”
26 U.S. Code §104(a)(2)

Get the one-page version for your CPA

The exact citations above, formatted on a single page you can print or forward. No cost.

✓ Done, check your inbox. Or open the PDF now →
Why it has to be done right

The paperwork is the whole game.

The IRS rule (Treas. Reg. §1.451-2) only defers the tax when your right to the money is “subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.” In plain English: the structure has to be documented — before the sale closes, so you genuinely can’t touch, pledge, accelerate, or sell the payment stream.

Done right, it’s ironclad. Done wrong, the whole gain is taxed now. That precision is exactly why only a handful of A-rated carriers offer this, and why you want it structured correctly from day one, not patched together after you’ve signed.
Don’t take our word for it

Ask Google if it’s legal.

is a structured installment sale legal
AI Overview

“Yes, structured installment sales are perfectly legal. They are an IRS-approved tax-planning strategy authorized under Internal Revenue Code Section 453… [it] allows sellers of appreciated capital assets to defer capital gains taxes by spreading their payouts over multiple tax years.”

The CPA Journal MetLife RBC Wealth Management GRF CPAs & Advisors Ringler Associates Wikipedia

Google’s AI Overview, generated from mainstream sources, not from us.

What could you keep with SIS?

Two numbers. Apples-to-apples. Both sides earn 4%/yr, 20-year horizon, MFJ filing, conservative on purpose.

You could keep approximately
$—
more after 20 years
Tax-bracket compression alone (no yield assumed):~$—
+ 4% yield compounded both sides:~$—
Accounts for your $200,000/yr existing income. Your tax brackets are stacked on top of this, higher existing income = more SIS upside. Adjust the income field to see how it moves.
See the full breakdown →
Illustrative ballpark. Input treated as your capital gain (sale price minus cost basis). Assumes MFJ, 20-yr horizon, 4% yield on both sides (cash net reinvested at 4% taxed-as-earned; SIS at 4% carrier credit, each year’s after-tax payment also reinvested at 4%). Conservative on purpose. Real returns vary, carrier rates change, tax law changes. Not tax or investment advice, consult your CPA. Adjust assumptions →

Where do you fit?

Pick your path, each has its own page built around your situation. Prefer to browse? Everything on this site stays open to you.

Injured plaintiff with a settlement instead? §104 structured settlements →
Be Honest, There Is a Catch

So what’s the catch?

One word: irrevocability. Once the train leaves the station, it’s going to the next station. No matter what.

The honest catch

An SIS is irrevocable. Once it’s funded at closing, you can’t unwind it.

The carrier-funded annuity payments are non-commutable and non-assignable by you, the payee. That’s a structural requirement of §453 treatment, if the payments were freely convertible to cash, the IRS would treat the whole sale as a Year 1 cash transaction and the deferral wouldn’t work. So you can’t sell the income stream. You can’t pull a lump sum if something comes up. You can’t change the schedule once the carrier issues the annuity.

It’s a one-way door. That’s the cost of the bracket compression.

One important nuance: the SIS contract itself is irrevocable, but the beneficiary designation on the annuity is revocable. You can change who receives the remaining payments at your death (spouse, kids, trust, charity) at any time during the term, same way you’d update beneficiaries on a 401(k) or IRA. The schedule and dollar amount are locked; the recipient at your death is not.
But fear not

…because it’s a Swiss train. It’ll show up on time. And it’ll pay out.

The obligor on your payment stream isn’t the buyer who just walked away from escrow. It’s an A-rated U.S. life-insurance carrier with hundreds of billions in general-account assets, a 100-plus-year operating history, and a regulated reserve framework that’s never failed to pay structured-settlement annuity holders in the modern era. The payment shows up every month, exactly on schedule, exactly the dollar amount printed on the contract.

Backstopped further by CLHIGA, the California Life & Health Insurance Guarantee Association, 80% of present value up to $250K per insured if a carrier ever did fail. Annuity guarantees are subject to the claims-paying ability of the issuing carrier.

The other catch, the one that kills deals

“Wait, isn’t this one of those J.G. Wentworth ‘it’s my money and I need it now’ things?”

No, and this is the single most common reason a deal dies. Someone in the seller’s life, a cousin, a brother-in-law, a friend at the gym, runs a 30-second Google search on “structured settlement,” lands on a secondary-market ad or a lottery-winnings horror story, and concludes the seller is being scammed. Deal dead.

Here’s the actual distinction, it’s about direction, not whether you’re a “receiver.” Both parties technically receive structured payments. The difference is which direction the deal runs:

  • The J.G. Wentworth side, cashing out of a structure. Someone already has a structured-settlement annuity (usually a personal-injury or lottery payout). They want a lump sum today, so they sell their future payments to a factoring company at a steep discount, they take 50¢ or 60¢ on the dollar to escape the schedule. That’s the loss-of-value transaction the commercials joke about.
  • The SIS side, entering a structure at face value. You’re going the other way. Your sale proceeds buy a brand-new annuity directly from an A++ carrier, at face value, with the full tax-deferral benefit of §453. No discount, no factoring company, no secondary market, same structure Fortune 500 self-insurance trusts and the federal court system use to fund their own obligations. The payments are contractually guaranteed by a top-rated insurance carrier and backstopped by the California Life & Health Insurance Guarantee Association up to applicable limits.

One is the discount-store exit. The other is the wholesale entry. Same word on Google. Opposite direction of money.

Different product. Different direction. Different math. Same two words on Google, which is why this misunderstanding is rare-as-a-unicorn in practice but kills a real number of deals when it surfaces. Trust takes time. That’s fair enough. Run the calculator, read the carrier’s white paper, talk to your CPA. The structure has been in the tax code for 100 years.

The other obvious question

“If I'm willing to take payments anyway, why not just take them from the buyer?”

Who do you trust more, a Fortune 500 life-insurance carrier (household-name, A-rated, $100B+ in regulated reserves) writing your checks for the next 25 years, or the buyer's ability to keep paying you over the entire term?

That’s the problem the SIS solves.

A useful analogy

Think about the last house you sold. The buyer got a mortgage. The BANK wired you the full purchase price at closing, not the buyer. You walked away with the check. You never followed up monthly to make sure the buyer was still paying their mortgage on time. You didn’t worry about whether they’d lose their job in year 12 and default. That entire 30-year credit-risk problem was the bank’s, not yours.

The SIS does the same job for the seller side. The carrier's assignment company takes the buyer's lump-sum at closing, the same way a mortgage bank takes the borrower's loan funds, and then makes the long-term payments to you. The institutional middleman absorbs the credit risk. You trust the SIS carrier for the same reason you trust the mortgage bank: they’re too big, too regulated, and too well-capitalized not to deliver. The direction of money flow is reversed; the trust architecture is identical.

Yes, you can take payments directly from the buyer, it's called seller financing or a traditional installment sale, and the §453 tax benefit works the same way. But you've now made yourself the bank for 10–25 years, and the risk profile flips entirely.

Buyer credit risk. Buyer life events (divorce, death, bankruptcy). Buyer wanting to prepay (which collapses your §453 deferral). Buyer wanting to renegotiate when rates change. Buyer moving across state lines making enforcement hard. Foreclosure costs if they default. Selling the note triggers a §453B disposition. Buyers usually want a 5–15% price discount to take terms. You become the loan-servicer doing the admin work. No professional infrastructure behind a private note.

The SIS was specifically engineered to give you the §453 tax benefit while replacing your buyer with an A-rated U.S. life carrier as the obligor, eliminating almost every failure mode of the traditional approach.

Read the 10 reasons in detail →

The brilliance, never all-or-nothing

99% of the time, we carve out cash at closing for your liquidity.

The irrevocability concern is real, and the answer is built into the structure: you take a cash carve-out at closing for the dollars you need liquid, emergency fund, replacement-home down payment, college tuition, debt payoff, the next 18 months of living expenses, whatever. That cash is yours, in your account, fully liquid, Day 1 of closing.

Only the remainder structures through the SIS into the carrier-funded annuity for the bracket-compressed lifetime payment stream. Typical split: 20–40% cash, 60–80% structured. Sometimes 50/50. Sometimes 15/85. There’s no fixed rule, the math works at any split, and we right-size the carve-out to whatever level of liquidity actually fits your life.

Minimum structured amount: $500,000. The carrier-funded structured-annuity infrastructure has a floor, below ~$500K of structured premium, the carrier paperwork and broker overhead aren’t economic for the carrier or for you. Above $500K of structured premium, the SIS pencils. Carve-out is whatever you want above that, on a $2M sale at the $500K minimum, that’s up to $1.5M cash at closing.
Two-pool logic:
  • Pool A, the cash carve-out: liquid, in your control, deployed however you need (debt payoff, replacement property, MYGA, market, business).
  • Pool B, the SIS: the irrevocable but bracket-compressed structured stream from an A-rated carrier. This is your guaranteed floor for 5–40 years.

The catch is real. The answer is the carve-out. Almost nobody puts 100% of the sale into the structure, that’s not how this should be done.

How the deal actually works

Five players. Two extra pieces of paper. Same escrow timeline as any normal California sale.

1

You sign with the SIS condition

The buyer signs the standard Purchase Agreement plus a one-page SIS rider. Same loan, same contingencies, same 30-45 day timeline. No different from any cash sale, except for that one page.

2

Wire splits at closing

Buyer wires the full sale price to escrow on closing day. Escrow records the deed and splits the wire per the rider: cash carve-out → you, remainder → the assignment company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the same Fortune 500 life carrier writing your annuity, not a sketchy third party. Buyer walks away with zero ongoing obligation.

3

A-rated carrier pays you for life

The assignment company immediately uses the remainder to purchase an annuity from an A-rated insurance carrier. The carrier becomes the obligor and pays you monthly/annually for 5-40 years, pro-rata gain recognition each year keeps you in low brackets.

Full mechanics, players, wire flow, paperwork →
Critical distinction, read this

SIS is NOT a traditional seller-financed installment sale.

When most people hear “installment sale,” they think of the old-school version where the buyer pays the seller directly over time, like seller-financed real estate. That arrangement carries massive buyer-default risk for the seller and is NOT what the SIS does.

QuestionTraditional installment saleStructured Installment Sale (SIS)
Who owes the seller the payments?The BUYERAn A-rated INSURANCE CARRIER (via the carrier's own assignment-company subsidiary)
When does the buyer pay?Monthly to seller for 10-30 yearsFull cash at closing (just like any normal sale)
Does the buyer know about the structure?Yes, they ARE the obligor; their signature on the note IS the payment promiseYes, buyer signs a one-page SIS rider acknowledging the structure exists. The rider disclaims any ongoing payment responsibility, the structured payments are the carrier’s obligation, not theirs.
If buyer defaults?Seller stops getting paid, buyer-default riskN/A, buyer already paid in full. Carrier owes the seller, not the buyer.
Backing the payment stream?Buyer’s creditworthiness onlyA-rated insurance carrier’s general account + CLHIGA state guaranty (80%/$250K cap)
Tax treatment§453 installment method§453 installment method (same code, same blessing in Rev. Proc. 2005-26)

Bottom line: the SIS keeps the §453 spread-tax benefit of the old installment sale but eliminates the buyer-default risk. The buyer wires the full sale price to escrow on closing day, same as any cash sale. Escrow splits the wire per the SIS rider: any cash carve-out goes to you, the rest goes to the assignment company which immediately purchases an annuity from an A-rated carrier. The carrier becomes the obligor.

For contingency-fee counsel

If you’re the lawyer, not the seller.

A big verdict is supposed to feel like a win. The 1099 in January usually decides whether it does.

A contingency-fee attorney who hits a big verdict takes the entire fee as ordinary income in the year of settlement, same year, top bracket, gone. That’s the default.

In 1994 the Tax Court, and in 1996 the Eleventh Circuit, said it doesn’t have to be. In Childs v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 634 (aff’d 89 F.3d 856), the court held that a properly designed pre-settlement structure, the defendant’s obligation assigned to a third-party carrier, fee paid out as a multi-year annuity, does not trigger constructive receipt and is not §83 “property.” Translation: you choose the schedule, the carrier guarantees the payments, and the IRS doesn’t tax you on what you haven’t been paid yet.

Thirty years on, Childs has never been overturned. The IRS has rumbled in chief counsel advice (CCA 201151018) but hasn’t won a courtroom challenge. Major firms structure fees every quarter on the strength of it.

Who it fits
  • Plaintiff-side firms with a contingency-fee award > $250K
  • Class-action and mass-tort lead/liaison counsel
  • ERISA fee awards and §1988 statutory fees
  • Solo and boutique litigators expecting a tail of big years
What we do
  • Design the deferral schedule with you before settlement papers are signed
  • Coordinate assignment language with defense counsel and the carrier
  • Place the annuity with an A-rated carrier (Independent Life, Pacific Life, MetLife ABG, depending on case profile)
  • Sit with your CPA on the reporting side, the 1099 mechanics are straightforward once you’ve done one
Read the full Childs framework →
Or call 213-414-2808 if you’re sitting on a settlement next month.
Common objections, answered

The other questions every sharp seller asks.

Each of these comes up by call #2. Short, honest answers below.

“Why have I never heard of this 1031 exchange alternative?”

Because it’s a specialized niche that nobody markets the way 1031s are pushed. Two reasons: first, only a handful of A-rated carriers structure these, a property or business sale uses a “non-qualified assignment,” which is more complex for the carrier than the structured settlements they do for injury cases, so most don’t bother. Second, it takes precise, up-front paperwork to qualify (the IRS’s “substantial limitations or restrictions” rule), so it’s built deal-by-deal with an advisor, not sold off a shelf. The whole real-estate industry promotes 1031s because everyone earns a commission on the replacement purchase, nobody’s running ads for this, which is exactly why the people who use it tend to be the well-advised.

“What’s the catch? Any downsides?”

Two, and I’ll be straight about both. 1) Illiquidity. To be legal, the structure has to be rigid, the same IRS rule that defers your tax (“substantial limitations or restrictions”) means you genuinely can’t touch, accelerate, or pledge the structured money once it’s set. That’s the trade for the deferral. We almost always carve out some cash at closing for liquidity, but the structured portion is locked to the schedule. 2) No step-up in basis at death. If you pass away mid-schedule, your heirs don’t get a stepped-up basis on the remaining payments, it’s “income in respect of a decedent,” so they pay the deferred tax as the payments arrive. For some estates that matters; for others it doesn’t. Your CPA can weigh it against your situation.

"What about inflation? I'm locking in 4.5–5% for 25 years."

Real concern. Three answers: (1) the SIS schedule can be quoted with an annual COLA step-up (typically 3%/yr), trades some upfront payout rate for inflation protection; (2) the cash carve-out at closing is yours to deploy into any inflation-hedge asset class you want; (3) the SIS removes sequence-of-returns risk and credit risk on the structured portion, which is its own form of protection. The honest trade: SIS protects against market and credit risk; pair it with carve-out plus a COLA rider for inflation.

"How do you get paid? Where's your conflict of interest?"

The carrier pays the placing structured-settlement broker a commission of roughly 3–4% of structured premium, baked into the carrier's pricing. You pay nothing out of pocket. The rate-to-you is the same regardless of which licensed broker places the case, the carrier publishes one set of rates. Same standard the structured-settlement industry has used since 1982.

"What if the carrier fails in year 18?"

SIS annuities are backed by the carrier's general account, regulated reserves, and state insurance-department oversight. If a carrier ever did fail, your state's life-insurance guaranty association steps in, in California, that's CLHIGA, covering 80% of present value up to $250K per insured per carrier. Insolvencies in the structured-settlement carrier space are historically rare. Large placements ($1M+) are commonly split across two carriers to double the CLHIGA coverage.

"What if I move out of California after closing?"

Depends on what you sold. The federal §453 treatment is unchanged, recognized gain spreads over your payment years no matter where you live. But the state-source question is where most online advice gets it wrong:

  • CA real estate? CA taxes the remaining gain forever, even if you've moved. The property's location locks the source.
  • Closely-held C-corp or S-corp stock sold directly by you (the individual)? Intangible → sourced to your state of residence when each payment is received. Move to TX / NV / FL / WY / TN / SD / AK before payments arrive and the CA piece drops off remaining gain.
  • Asset sale of a CA business through an S-corp or LLC? Goodwill gets apportioned back to CA at the entity level (2009 Metropoulos Family Trust v. FTB, Cal. Ct. App. 2022) even if you've moved. This is the trap.
  • Partnership / LLC interest sale? Mostly residence-sourced for the non-hot intangible portion, but §751 "hot assets" apportion to CA (FTB Legal Ruling 2022-02), and any CA real property inside the entity stays CA-source.
  • Out-of-state real estate, sold by a CA resident who moves first? No CA claim at all if you're a nonresident when payments are received.

Translation: SIS + a move to a no-tax state works beautifully for the right asset, structured the right way. It does not automatically erase CA tax on every SIS. See the full breakdown, case law, citations, asset-by-asset map: Moving out of CA, which assets actually escape CA tax through SIS.

"What if the buyer changes their mind about the addendum at closing?"

The SIS addendum is signed as part of the Purchase & Sale Agreement weeks before closing, not at the closing table. If the buyer tries to back out of it the day of close, you walk, same as any other contract condition not being met. In practice this is exceptionally rare; the addendum is one page imposing zero ongoing obligation on the buyer, so there's nothing for them to object to.

"What happens to the payments if I die?"

Remaining scheduled payments pass to your designated beneficiary (spouse, kids, trust, charity) at the same dollar amount, on the same dates, until the term ends. Nothing reverts to the carrier. The beneficiary inherits as Income in Respect of a Decedent (IRD) under §691, with the §691(c) deduction available for any estate tax paid on the remaining payments' present value. Beneficiary designation is revocable any time during your lifetime.

"What does an IRS audit on an SIS actually look like?"

The carrier issues an annual 1099 with each payment broken into recognized gain (LTCG), imputed interest (ordinary), and basis return (tax-free). Your CPA reports those numbers on Form 6252. The carrier maintains the gross-profit-ratio calculation; you keep the original closing documents. In an audit, the IRS receives the same 1099 the carrier sent you, there's no parallel reporting universe. SIS is one of the cleanest installment-method audit profiles because everything ties to a carrier-supplied tax form.

"Will my CPA know what this is?"

Probably not by name, mainstream CPAs see SIS rarely (the best-kept-secret problem). But the underlying mechanics are basic §453 installment-method tax which every CPA learned in school. Send them the CPA Journal article and the MetLife white paper; both walk through the structure with citations. The standard CPA response after 30 minutes of reading is "ah, this is a fixed-term §453 installment sale funded by a structured-settlement annuity, that's fine."

Who’s behind this Hans Goldstein

Hans Goldstein, Goldstein & Co.

A California-licensed insurance producer (NPN 20602398) focused on one thing: placing the IRS-recognized structures that let sellers and attorneys spread a big tax bill over years instead of one. A-rated carriers only, and a straight “no” when your deal doesn’t actually fit.

More about Hans →

213-414-2808 · [email protected]

See your sale, not someone else’s example.

The calculator runs your specific California sale through real 2026 federal + CA tax brackets, including §121 exclusion, §1250 recapture, NIIT, IRMAA, and the Mental Health Services Tax.

Run the calculator → 213-414-2808

Capital gains tax deferral guides

Capital Gains Tax Calculator, see your number Defer tax selling a business in California Avoid capital gains on a California rental Alternatives to a 1031 exchange Is a Deferred Sales Trust safe & legit? Compare 5 deferral structures

See all guides & calculators →