No hand-waving. The same $4M sale run two ways (straight cash sale versus a Structured Installment Sale) using real 2026 California + federal brackets. This is the page to send the seller who thinks in spreadsheets, or the CPA on the call.
Seller bought a commercial property years ago for $600K. It's now worth $4M. The taxable gain is $3,400,000. Assume a high-income California seller: 20% federal cap gains + 3.8% NIIT + 13.3% CA = roughly a 37% blended rate on the gain if it all lands in one year. (Depreciation recapture at 25% would make the cash-sale side worse; we keep it simple here.)
Send me the sale price and rough basis. Within one business day I'll email you the actual number and the Seller's Guide to §453. If it doesn't fit your deal, I'll tell you that plainly.
No retainer · no obligation. Hans Goldstein, a licensed insurance agent (CA Insurance License #4273294), will contact you and may discuss insurance products, including annuities.
Two things are working at once. First, bracket arbitrage: a $3.4M spike shoves the entire gain into the top capital-gains bracket and triggers full NIIT; slicing it into ~$340K annual pieces keeps most of each year in lower bands. Second, time value: the tax you don't pay in Year 1 stays invested and compounding inside a fixed-rate contract, so a dollar of deferred tax is worth less than a dollar paid today.
The seller can also tune the schedule (front-load income, back-load it into retirement years when other income and their bracket are lower, or match it to a spouse's retirement). That flexibility is where the biggest savings often hide.
That ~$300K swing is frequently larger than the entire bid-ask gap that was killing the deal, which is exactly why this closes stalled sales.
Illustrative only, not tax advice. Actual results depend on the seller's basis, income, filing status, recapture, and the schedule chosen; every case is run on the seller's real numbers and reviewed with their CPA. Prefer the human side of this? Read why sellers freeze at the closing table.