Sequence-of-Returns Risk · Worked Example · $1M Portfolio

$1M into the S&P, drawing 5%/yr from Jan 2000.
After 24 years, you have $170K left.

Sequence-of-returns risk is the difference between “the market returned 7% on average” and “you ran out of money in 2018.” This page shows the exact year-by-year math on a real-world starting point: $1,000,000 invested Jan 1, 2000, withdrawing $50,000/yr for income, riding actual S&P 500 total returns through 2023.

Before you read further

What is the tax bill on your sale going to be?

Send me the sale price and rough basis and I'll email you the actual number within one business day — plus the Seller's Guide to §453. If it doesn't fit your deal, I'll tell you that plainly.

No retainer · no obligation · the carrier compensates the broker, not you.

The setup: same numbers everyone uses, applied to a real start year

You’re 65. You just sold the property/business/asset. You have $1,000,000 in cash. You need $50,000/yr of retirement income, that’s a 5% withdrawal rate, well within the famous “4% rule” safe-withdrawal guideline. You put the whole $1M into a diversified S&P 500 index fund and start drawing.

It’s January 2000. The S&P 500 has averaged 7% over the long run. You feel fine.

What you don’t know yet

The next three years (2000, 2001, 2002) will be the dot-com crash. Then 2008 will be the financial crisis. Then 2022 will be another double-digit drawdown. Each of those bear markets happens while you’re also withdrawing $50K/yr, locking in losses, shrinking the principal base that needs to compound back. This is sequence-of-returns risk.

Year by year, actual S&P 500 total returns, Jan 2000 to Dec 2023

Withdrawal of $50,000 at the start of each year, then the remainder rides the year’s S&P 500 total return (dividends reinvested). Negative years shaded red.

YearStart balanceWithdrawPost-w/dS&P returnEnd balance
2000$1,000,000−$50,000$950,000−9.1%$863,550
2001$863,550−$50,000$813,550−11.9%$716,738
2002$716,738−$50,000$666,738−22.1%$519,389
2003$519,389−$50,000$469,389+28.7%$604,103
2004$604,103−$50,000$554,103+10.9%$614,500
2005$614,500−$50,000$564,500+4.9%$592,200
2006$592,200−$50,000$542,200+15.8%$627,870
2007$627,870−$50,000$577,870+5.5%$609,652
2008$609,652−$50,000$559,652−37.0%$352,581
2009$352,581−$50,000$302,581+26.5%$382,765
2010$382,765−$50,000$332,765+15.1%$383,012
2011$383,012−$50,000$333,012+2.1%$340,005
2012$340,005−$50,000$290,005+16.0%$336,406
2013$336,406−$50,000$286,406+32.4%$379,201
2014$379,201−$50,000$329,201+13.7%$374,302
2015$374,302−$50,000$324,302+1.4%$328,842
2016$328,842−$50,000$278,842+12.0%$312,303
2017$312,303−$50,000$262,303+21.8%$319,485
2018$319,485−$50,000$269,485−4.4%$257,628
2019$257,628−$50,000$207,628+31.5%$273,031
2020$273,031−$50,000$223,031+18.4%$264,069
2021$264,069−$50,000$214,069+28.7%$275,506
2022$275,506−$50,000$225,506−18.1%$184,690
2023$184,690−$50,000$134,690+26.3%$170,114
2024 start$170,114(remaining)$170,114

The damage report

S&P 500 path

$170,114 left
Started $1M Jan 2000. Withdrew $50K/yr ($1.2M cumulative). After 24 years of actual market returns, the corpus collapsed to ~$170K, and is still dropping every year you keep withdrawing $50K. The portfolio runs out in ~3–4 more years at this withdrawal pace. You’ll be 89.

SIS equivalent path

$50K every year, guaranteed
Same $1M sale, structured at closing into a 30-year SIS at a typical ~5% carrier yield. ~$55K/yr shows up every January from an A-rated insurance carrier. Doesn’t matter what the S&P did. Doesn’t matter if there’s a bear market. Same number, same month, every year for the term.

What went wrong

The S&P 500 averaged ~7.2% per year from 2000 to 2023 (total return, dividends reinvested). On paper that’s a great long-run return. But the order of the returns matters far more than the average when you’re drawing income:

The point

The market produced its long-run average return. The portfolio still nearly went to zero. That’s sequence-of-returns risk. It’s the single biggest unaddressed risk in retirement income, and it’s the reason “just invest your sale proceeds in the market” isn’t actually a retirement plan, it’s a bet on the order of returns showing up favorably.

How the SIS removes sequence-of-returns risk

The Structured Installment Sale eliminates sequence risk on the portion of your wealth that’s structured because:

This isn’t an argument against ever investing

It’s an argument against putting 100% of your sale proceeds into the market and calling it a retirement plan. The two-pool framing solves this:

Sequence-of-returns risk doesn’t go away on the Pool B side, but the floor from Pool A means you don’t have to sell into a down market to fund the next month’s grocery bill. The structured floor lets the cash pool ride out bear markets without forced selling. That’s exactly the dynamic the 2000-vintage retiree in the table above didn’t have.

Where sequence-of-returns risk shows up in retirement

The S&P illustration above is the classic case. But the same dynamic hits three other places retirees rely on for income:

Want this run on YOUR specific numbers?

The advanced calculator models the same sequence-of-returns scenarios against your actual sale price, basis, age, and income. Twenty-minute call to walk through whether SIS, or SIS + cash carve-out, fits your situation.

Run your specific scenario → 213-340-2018
Hans Goldstein, NPN 20602398

📚 Get the free Seller's Guide to §453 + a fit-check

A plain-English guide for sellers: how a structured installment sale defers the tax when you sell a business, practice, or property — the math, the alternatives, and how to know if your deal fits.

Drop your info — instant PDF download + within 1 business day Hans will email a preliminary read on which structure fits your deal. No retainer. Carrier compensates the broker — not you.

I agree to receive calls and texts from Hans Goldstein at the number provided. Msg/data rates apply. Reply STOP to opt out.

📞 Hans Goldstein · 213-340-2018 · CA Insurance License #4322192 · Independent §453 specialist · Goldstein & Co. LLC

Get my number Call 213-340-2018