A Deferred Sales Trust can defer your capital gains bill. It does it by routing your sale proceeds through a private trust and a promissory note, a structure the IRS has scrutinized for years and never blessed with a clean revenue ruling. Before you sign, here's what that actually means for your money.
A Deferred Sales Trust (DST — not to be confused with a Delaware Statutory Trust, which uses the same three letters) works like this: you sell your appreciated property or business to a third-party trust instead of the end buyer. The trust then resells to the real buyer, and pays you back over time with a private installment note. Because you're technically owed money by the trust rather than holding cash from the sale, the promoter argues you defer the gain under general installment-sale principles.
The idea borrows the logic of IRC §453, but the vehicle carrying it — a bespoke trust, usually set up and administered by the same firm that sold you the strategy — is not itself a creature of the tax code. There's no dedicated statute for "Deferred Sales Trust." That distinction matters more than most sellers realize.
The IRS has flagged DST-style trust arrangements in exam activity and in public warnings about installment-sale trusts that lack independent trustees or that leave the seller with too much practical control over the trust's investments. The core risk is constructive receipt and economic benefit: if you (the seller) can direct how the trust invests your deferred proceeds, or if the trustee is functionally your own advisor wearing a different hat, an examiner can argue you never really gave up the money — which collapses the deferral and triggers the entire gain, plus interest and penalties, in the year of sale.
There is no private letter ruling that blesses the DST as a category. Each one stands or falls on its own facts: how independent the trustee really is, what the trust invests in, and how the note is structured. That's a different risk posture than relying on a code section with a hundred years of settled case law.
In a DST, your deferred proceeds sit inside a trust, managed by a trustee who is often affiliated with the firm that promoted the strategy to you. The trust typically invests the money in a portfolio — bonds, market instruments, sometimes annuities inside the trust — chosen by that trustee. If the portfolio underperforms, you bear the loss; there's no A-rated insurance carrier standing behind a fixed payment stream the way there is in a straight §453 installment sale funded through an annuity.
You're also trusting the trustee's independence and solvency for the life of the payout, often 10-20 years. If the promoter firm has financial or leadership problems, your deferred money is tied to that firm's trust department, not to a regulated third party.
DST promoters typically charge an upfront setup fee, often 1.5%-2.5% of the sale proceeds, plus an ongoing annual trustee/management fee that can run another 1%-2% a year for the life of the trust. On a $3,000,000 sale, that can mean $45,000-$75,000 at closing and $30,000-$60,000 a year afterward — fees a straight §453 installment sale funded with an A-rated annuity generally doesn't carry in the same layered way, because the carrier's cost is priced into the contract, not stacked on top of a trustee fee.
A Structured Installment Sale (SIS) uses the same underlying idea — pay tax as you receive payments instead of all at once — but skips the private trust entirely. The buyer pays 100% cash at closing. The obligation to pay you is assigned to a licensed, regulated assignment company, which funds a fixed annuity from an A-rated insurance carrier. You're the payee, not the owner, so there's no constructive receipt question to litigate. The carrier is regulated by state insurance departments and backed by state guaranty associations, not by a promoter's trust department.
This isn't a workaround dressed up in code-section language — it's the same installment-sale doctrine (IRC §453) that's been used by ordinary sellers for decades, married to the same funding mechanism insurance companies use for structured settlements. See exactly how it differs from a DST, or read the §453 mechanics in plain English.
Every deal is different. Run your own numbers before you compare — a $2,000,000 gain deferred over 10 years lands very differently than one deferred over 20, and your bracket matters as much as the structure.
It can be structured legally, but the IRS has not issued a clean ruling blessing the category, and outcomes depend heavily on trustee independence and how much control the seller retains. This is educational information, not tax or legal advice — have your CPA or attorney review any specific structure before you sign.
The IRS has scrutinized installment-sale trust arrangements broadly, particularly around constructive receipt and economic benefit doctrines when a trustee isn't truly independent from the seller or the promoter. Individual outcomes vary by the facts of each trust.
A DST routes your proceeds through a private trust with a trustee often tied to the promoter. A Structured Installment Sale assigns the payment obligation to a licensed third party that funds an A-rated insurance carrier annuity — no trust, no promoter-affiliated trustee.
Yes. If the trust's underlying investments lose value, that loss generally passes through to you as the beneficiary, since there's no fixed-annuity guarantee unless the trustee separately buys one.
No. They both defer tax on a big gain, but the legal mechanics, the parties involved, and where your principal sits are fundamentally different. See the side-by-side comparison for specifics.
Plug in your sale price, basis, and state — the calculator runs your exact 2026 federal + California tax and shows what a Structured Installment Sale keeps in your pocket.
See your number → Full calculator
Or talk it through: 213-340-2018 · Hans Goldstein · NPN 20602398. Educational only — not tax, legal, or accounting advice.
